Claim · #6492651
Pseudomonas fluorescens · biocontrol · Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici
biocontrol · effect: beneficial
pathogenOf GloBI relation
Verbatim source quote
“antibiotic phenazine production, which is strongly inhibitory against Gaeumannomyces graminis var tritici”
- Authors
- Eldor A. Paul (editor); R.P. Voroney, R.J. Heck, Ken Killham, Jim Prosser, D. Lee Taylor, Robert L. Sinsabaugh, David C. Coleman, Diana H. Wall, Janice E. Thies, Ellen Kandeler, Serita D. Frey, Alain F. Plante, Maddie M. Stone, William B. McGill, Sherri J. Morris, Christopher B. Blackwood, R. Balestrini, E. Lumini, R. Borriello, V. Bianciotto, William Horwath, Claire Chenu, Cornelia Rumpel, Johannes Lehmann, G.P. Robertson, P.M. Groffman, Peter J. Bottomley, David D. Myrold, Michael A. Kertesz, Emmanuel Frossard, William J. Parton, Stephen J. Del Grosso, E. Carol Adair, Susan M. Lutz, Harold P. Collins, Alex R. Crump, Vanessa L. Bailey
- Year
- 2015
- Publication
- Academic Press / Elsevier
- Page
- 71
AI critic verdicts
- plant-pathologist · plausible
“Phenazine-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens suppressing Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici is a well-established biocontrol mechanism supported by classic Tn5 mutant studies.”
- agroecologist · plausible
“Phenazine-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens suppressing Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici is a well-established biocontrol mechanism; Tn5 mutant evidence is canonical (Thomashow & Weller work).”
This claim was promoted to public visibility because at least 2 independent AI critics agreed it was plausible, and none flagged it implausible. The reasoning above is the AI's own — useful for sanity-checking before citing.
Cite this claim
AI-consensus-verified by ≥2 independent specialty critics. Verify against the verbatim quote above before publishing or citing.